Dark Clan Forum

I like snow 

Titanfall is the most enjoyable game for me for the current time. But the beta could have been better. But for now, you feel like you miss something if you not gonna play it. CoD4 was fun for some quick matches. And Titanfall really adds some nice momentum to any fight. These jetpacks and wallruns are so nice to do. Love it

The "bugginess" may also derive from the surface you are using the mouse on.

Played UT3 with a opto-mechanical mouse (with a ball inside (!)) until late 2010s. It worked well. Very well, it was my best time :D. If you adept every settings, it's like an extended arm. 

Titanfall! 

[- I n s t a l l e r -]

- I n s t a l l e r -      

RypelCam Installer downloads for UT3 attached to this post.


For RypelCam Installer installation instructions please watch this video:



For a quick demonstration watch this video:

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaand a haapppppppppyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy new year, ev'rybodeeeeeey
 
EOF

What's that on that image?

Wish y'all the best for the next year. And have a good time the last days of Christmas.
 

There will be a revolutionary server soon 

If the game runs fine, everything mutator runs fine. So what did you do?

Greetings...
Big news: There will be a new _Dark_ server 

ut-x.net is one of the last community portal where you could download files, read news and so one for all the UT titles.

Too sad, the Webmaster has closed the site due to the death of UT.

  

 
As i said, it depends on the system. 
It also indicates that the server runs well - for that amount of player data to handle. You might be able glitch if the server is more populated - like 32 players.

UnrealEngine 3 runs in mondern Browsers (Firefox recently updated their release *not nightly build).
So they might publish UTLive  -> Limited content, high player count, DLC conent.

Try it for yourself
http://www.unrealengine.com/html5/

And watch this video - a fully working demo (it was playable at GDC)


Gaming has changed. There are more casual gamers than real pros. In addition, the technologies are heavily reverse engineered, so cheats and hacks are very common ... sadly.

Here's one advice to buy 

The worlds largest tablet. Lenovo Ideacentre Horizon 27
http://reviews.cnet.com/desktops/lenovo-ideacentre-horizon-27/4505-3118_7-35561100.html

I found a mistake. 
You bought a Wii (even tho, as a media center and Emulation console, it is really great) 

I must agree with Sev 

That's the official logo for their upcoming new Unreal Engine. It has 4 as its version number as well.

The hint for a new UT was on swedish online sales company.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=572569

They removed the listing for "Unreal Tournament". So it's either true (and they broke the NDA) or it was completely a goof. However, i don't think Epic Games only works on FortNite and their Engine.

Great.

Kind of the same solution as the guys over here:
http://social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/343/index/15865602/1

But that problem wasn't demorec related.

[what]

*ignoring the quality and the cam*

Check if his happens with client demos without UTComp. And try it with clean (not modified) ini.
Otherwise, reduce the TickRate in your inis.

Code:

[Engine.DemoRecDriver]
MaxClientRate=25000
NetServerMaxTickRate=30
LanServerMaxTickRate=30

PS: what are you just saying FCB

The repo for that specific version is up-to-date.

Btw, pawns may not be persistent, but player alias are - even if they ride a hoverboard, you still can retrace the driver. So, work on progress, I'm positive about this one.

That's the same approach as I did.

My concept of a replay mode is a simple multiarray of a limited number of logged movements. When you want to playback them, the game pauses and the original characters are moved to their previous positions. A real rewind would be better witout doubt, but I really cannot build on top of your code in the current state, sorry.

Would not work well without exceptions. One player (a pawn) is not persistent a match (death etc.) and the case a new hoverboard spawns each time the user switches to the board makes it more complex to move one player from point A to point B.

As you said, it was an attempt. I get 'devide by zero' in the log, only thing that happens is the player actors are hidden (what has nothing to do with the remaining code for the recording or playback of movements).


RecRecord(), RecPlay(optional float speed = 1), RecRewind(optional float speed = -1) have no effect.

This must be the port of my "attempt" as my "attempt" was a proof-of-concept which worked but needed to be optimized (dynamically spawn vehicles and apply properties and general interpolation). The other problem is the limitation of the array size (which increases rapidly if we log every actor).

Rattlesnake, please consider one advise: if you find your code working, please merge your changes to the trunk version of RCam. There are so many things in your branched version that make it impossible to overview the code. You turned 10 classes into 61, renamed most of Rypels code, added countless code examples from udn.com (which are never referenced by the remaining code in RCam) and start many experimental modifications without coming to a working version (Hermite interpolation, required to create a cam path).

The one version you're talking of is built on top of the stable version. And i migrated last updates to it (probably not the last at THIS time, must be 3.14 or something). And does not interfere anything RCam related. My attempt for a new/different interpolation mode was done to have a more flexible version for editing paths on runtime (with the need of a proper UIScene - -> Key framing in many video editing software (of matinee e.g.).


Long story short...
i think the POC of the recording method is not in the repo. Gonna check it...